<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This time it’s political</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.varsity.co.uk/entertainment/radio/2010/03/02/this-time-its-political/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.varsity.co.uk/entertainment/radio/2010/03/02/this-time-its-political/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:02:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alastair Beddow</title>
		<link>http://blog.varsity.co.uk/entertainment/radio/2010/03/02/this-time-its-political/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair Beddow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.varsity.co.uk/?p=819#comment-897</guid>
		<description>James

I don&#039;t really know what point you&#039;re making by posting that link - without any comment from you it makes it difficult to engage in an argument really, but I&#039;ll my best. 

If you&#039;re implying that I&#039;m jumping on a bandwagon of similarly outraged non-listeners of 6Music then you&#039;re very wrong. I&#039;ve been a listener to 6 since the days when Phil Jupitus was on the breakfast show and that&#039;s quite a while ago now. If you check back through my previous blogs you&#039;ll see that I&#039;ve been referencing 6Music way before it hit the headlines. 

If, however, you are merely implying that others are jumping on a bandwagon that may be so. That&#039;s as much the case with our politicians who are making judgements without actually listening to the service. Are Mark Thompson or Tim Davie regular listeners to 6Music? I dout it or they wouldn&#039;t be making such a poor decision to close the station. 

Yet this issue gets the heart of the BBC&#039;s direction and strategy - the corporation is in a mess really and the recent Strategic Review is simply tweaking at the edges and not getting to the heart of issue - in radio terms that would be Radios 1 and 2 and their relationship to commerical rivals. Mark Thompson would have you believe he&#039;s slimming down the BBC but he&#039;s not, he&#039;s merely diverting more money into &#039;high quality programming&#039; - exactly what 6Music provides, I would argue, and what a service like BBC Three often doesn&#039;t. 

The BBC&#039;s obsession with demographics and its dodgy political positioning is clouding its judgement, and that&#039;s the reason I feel so passionately about this review. Especially when it means that 6Music could be shut down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really know what point you&#8217;re making by posting that link &#8211; without any comment from you it makes it difficult to engage in an argument really, but I&#8217;ll my best. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re implying that I&#8217;m jumping on a bandwagon of similarly outraged non-listeners of 6Music then you&#8217;re very wrong. I&#8217;ve been a listener to 6 since the days when Phil Jupitus was on the breakfast show and that&#8217;s quite a while ago now. If you check back through my previous blogs you&#8217;ll see that I&#8217;ve been referencing 6Music way before it hit the headlines. </p>
<p>If, however, you are merely implying that others are jumping on a bandwagon that may be so. That&#8217;s as much the case with our politicians who are making judgements without actually listening to the service. Are Mark Thompson or Tim Davie regular listeners to 6Music? I dout it or they wouldn&#8217;t be making such a poor decision to close the station. </p>
<p>Yet this issue gets the heart of the BBC&#8217;s direction and strategy &#8211; the corporation is in a mess really and the recent Strategic Review is simply tweaking at the edges and not getting to the heart of issue &#8211; in radio terms that would be Radios 1 and 2 and their relationship to commerical rivals. Mark Thompson would have you believe he&#8217;s slimming down the BBC but he&#8217;s not, he&#8217;s merely diverting more money into &#8216;high quality programming&#8217; &#8211; exactly what 6Music provides, I would argue, and what a service like BBC Three often doesn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>The BBC&#8217;s obsession with demographics and its dodgy political positioning is clouding its judgement, and that&#8217;s the reason I feel so passionately about this review. Especially when it means that 6Music could be shut down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.varsity.co.uk/entertainment/radio/2010/03/02/this-time-its-political/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.varsity.co.uk/?p=819#comment-854</guid>
		<description>http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/arts-%26-entertainment/bbc-angers-fans-of-the-idea-of-6-music-201003032520/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/arts-%26-entertainment/bbc-angers-fans-of-the-idea-of-6-music-201003032520/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/arts-%26-entertainment/bbc-angers-fans-of-the-idea-of-6-music-201003032520/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
